Re: LF: New NoV

["Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>]

Its just a case of the  que's and cal's  :  cw is a  tech-nique  and  wspr is tech-nical  still tech !

 

Personally  I think it  should of been named ICARUS

 

G ..

From: Roger Lapthorn

Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:22 PM

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Subject: Re: LF: New NoV

CW good, WSPR good too     :-))

73s Roger G3XBM

On 11 February 2010 17:11, M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Well done Dom

 

Hope to hear you soon. CW Good  ......... WSPR BAD!! 

73 es GL petefmt

--- On Thu, 11/2/10, Dominic Baines <dominic.baines@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Dominic Baines <dominic.baines@gmail.com>

Subject: LF: New NoV

To: "rsgb lf group" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>

Date: Thursday, 11 February, 2010, 15:02

Hi all,

I just RX my SRP/NoV for 501-504kHz.
Hope to have my station up and running for TX as soon as possible.
Thanks for all those who since 2008 have so far had a cross band qso
perhaps we can manage a qso on 500kHz now.
Will focus on CW initially.

72

Dom
M1KTA

--

http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM
G3XBM    GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088