Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: AW: Re: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10 / PA design

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: AW: Re: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10 / PA design
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:25:39 -0000
References: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AC7C@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
An old scrap Line output transformer 3C5 material from a tube TV  will handle 1 Kw of RF and costs nothing.
For my LF and MF TX the LOPT came out of my junk box.
mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:51 PM
Subject: LF: AW: Re: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10 / PA design

Hello Jim!

First i want to say that i am glad to meet you here. Do you remember our QSO in 2004? And mni tnx for your article to the tuning meter (and others)! I have built it 2003 and it is for me the most useful measuring device on LF at all!

Yes, on 137kHz a half bridge is also a good idea since the losses are quite small. But, for a half or full bridge like in these decca transmitters, one needs an output ferrite core that can handle the whole output power. I think these are expensive (?), not easy to get and could be driven into saturation when dimensioned well. In my class e PA I use a single (!) IRFP360 that costs 1,9 Euro in the moment. This PA can easily handle 1kW with an efficiency of more than 96%. In the whole PA circuit, no ferrite cores are used, just two iron powder cores for the output filter. The driver is one cheap ICL7667, available for 1,1 Euro. All Capacitors are of the type wima FKP1 (2kV version), costs are below 1 Euro. So, I think a half bridge is more expensive?

Best 73 and hope for another QSO!!!

 

Stefan / DK7FC

 

 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von James Moritz
Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Dezember 2009 15:15
An: [email protected]
Betreff: LF: Re: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10 / PA design

 

Dear Stefan, LF Group,

 

A much better choice of circuit topology for QRO transmitters using an

off-line rectified mains PSU of about 330V is the half- or full bridge,

voltage-mode class D, as used in the "Decca" PAs, and G4JNT's off-line

design. Here the peak voltage across each MOSFET is only equal to the DC

supply voltage, so cheap 500V Mosfets designed for off-line SMPSUs are

ideal. The class E and push-pull current-mode class D designs are better for

relatively low voltage supplies, say < 40V.

 

The limitation on TX power that can be used at LF with a vertical antenna is

the antenna voltage, roughly Iant * XCant. In my experience, corona

breakdown becomes a problem in the 10 - 20kV range with a wire antenna. So

to use high power, and so achieve high antenna current and ERP, you need

high antenna capacitance. Also, the voltage will be increased if the antenna

loss resistance is low. I found that, with an 10m high inverted L antenna of

about 50m of wire in total, I could run 1.2kW reliably, provided care was

taken to eliminate sharp ends, narrow spacings, etc. in the antenna and

tuner. This resulted in up to 5A antenna current, and about 17kV on the

antenna wire. Even so, I have to increase the antenna height in order to

approach 1W ERP. At 500k, the antenna impedance is much lower, and

efficiency also usually higher, so TX power is less of a problem.

 

In my experience, DX contacts using QRSS30 are quite practical, given a

large supply of strong coffee! But with longer dot periods, good propagation

does not last long enough to complete even a minimal QSO.

 

Cheers, Jim Moritz

73 de M0BMU

 

 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>