Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Condx - and SDR IQ audio flatness?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Condx - and SDR IQ audio flatness?
From: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:07:10 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=50WkhsxFpGOTUSxttkEIntjwwloWYU9N8YGPvXIeT30=; b=VWBCsel6kd9uLQ5PkQQfm+gZ9FzuvHiirPO9WwgueMmXmo1SOajb8CzdmambYCA24l pkAsR1WXUlLwQdZt6i0xBCvPhMFg5E2RmNIFHyBJxrZDrdRnNetJS+jHCKIFAAnQQOFj x2IiO93VW3SwI3GQ+eiZDDBRYLVLzouyai2CU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TSJ/vINkpXlQYdCuECSSZbrm16R1OSQanAhP8Zkf/meVFOGy3qYW7myUZPuArphOUM YX3ZftMZOXwYkan9EzzF/kLYvh7xXE8e0aWkL3XsztRpSBFgInRqIe2LQwGW5H8u+572 1C0vZMl/PduIvPuMwd3fnRjxfVnYOiJHiDkVw=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Laurence, LF,

You wrote :-
"Anybody want to comment on whether their audio spectrum output from their SDR IQ is a bit "lumpy" with not exactly flat levelling across the 1-4Khz range? Maybe my soundcard but I see some variations of a couple of dBs on this one..."

I use a Softrock Lite on 500kHz connected to a Mini-Whip active antenna. I get a hump in various places depending on what part of the band the main antenna is tuned to, so I have to put up with that. If the main antenna is disconnected from the tuning coil at the base then the Softrock & Mini-Whip produces a flat band from 490 kHz to 510 kHz.

2009/11/17 Laurence BY3A-KL1X China <[email protected]>
Congrats all -
 
 its a very (very) quiet night so far on LF/MF which may signify either very good or very bad, and am present looking for signals from NA -
 
 
Im not that good to tell you which until Eu gets dark. Its not been very good the past day or so with mediocre signals on 137 from DCF39 et al  - still Ill be looking on any desired freq.
 
I can hear Loran clatter on 137 which means the local QRN is very low and NDB "DD" (Located near Xlbreast, China) :-) is putting is a Fully developed signal. 
 
Nice clear night here already and looking for some nice shooting stars..saw a couple of
spectacular ones last week in Mexico.
 
Anybody want to comment on whether their audio spectrum output from their SDR IQ is a bit "lumpy" with not exactly flat levelling across the 1-4Khz range? Maybe my soundcard but I see some variations of a couple of dBs on this one...
 
Laurence KL1 X in BY3A
 
Still jetlagged.
 
 
 
 
> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:13:41 +0100
> To: [email protected]
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: LF: 500kHz VX9MRC & WE2XGR/6
>
> Peter,
>
> likewise, I saw on Joe's website that you had a QRSS3 QSO with him
> earlier some days ago.
>
> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
>
> At 11:04 17/11/2009, you wrote:
> >Congratulations Rik
> >
> >Peter, G3LDO
> > > Rik,
> > >
> > > Well done.
> > >
> > > I should be in a position to attempt the same as I saw solid QRS
> > > signals from Joe.
> > >
> > > Gary - G4WGT.
> > >
> > > 2009/11/17 Rik Strobbe <[email protected]
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > >
> > > Gary, All,
> > >
> > > yesterday I could copy VX9MRC in QRSS3 with a surprising strong
> > > signal as early as 18 UTC, when I launched Argo.
> > > Throughout the evening the signal was strong and with little QSB
> > > from 19-22UTC, after that the signal became weaker with much more QSB.
> > > Probably because I had a sked with Joe at 22:40 UTC ;-) .
> > > But despite all we managed to complete the QSO with both way M
> > > report (would have been a solid O earlier the evening).
> > > A first ON-VE QSO on 500kHz and with +/- 4075km a new DX record for me
> > > Joe transmitted on 507.770 and I on 501.190.
> > > Between 19 and 22 UTC the signal was audible most of the time and
> > > would have been CW copy if it were not squeezed between the NDB
> > > "Z" carrier at 507.980 (S9+ here) the SM6BHZ CW/SSB test
> > > transmissions (up to S9) and a local birdie on 507.600.
> > >
> > > For the QSO I was running 300W into my 11m high / 25m long lazy-L
> > > antenna, estimated ERP about 1.5 Watt (at best, if the greenery
> > > does not absorb too much)
> > >
> > > The night from Sunday - Monday I left Argo running, VX9MRC
> > > produced a good signal all through the night and faded out at
> > > 07UTC. This would mean that there is a potential transatlantic
> > > path on 500kHz for 13h a day !!!
> > >
> > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
> > >
> > > At 17:05 16/11/2009, you wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Good signals from both stations last night.
> > >
> > > Gary - G4WGT - IO83qo.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>



Windows 7: It works the way you want. Learn more.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>