Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re Propagation report

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re Propagation report
From: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:39:47 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <006001ca4763$a69a1290$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <002601ca4766$1ff29bb0$6c01a8c0@DELL4> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <F1FBC7A69D7E409DA52460C6547DC64B@JimPC> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

David,

You might try some web searching on the subject, as there is some material on calibrating receiving setups and making field measurements. Here's one possibility:
http://www.w1tag.com/LF_FSM.htm

John, W1TAG

David Weinreich wrote:
Jim,
Thanks very much for the explanation it's very helpful. Too bad there aren't very many calibrated receivers and antennas. 73, David Weinreich
WA2VUJ/3

 >>>
*From: *  "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
*To:*     <[email protected]>
*Date: *  10/07/09 4:02 PM
*Subject: *   Re: LF:  Re Propagation report

Dear David, LF Group,

There are basically two ways of determining ERP, briefly:

Method 1 is to calculate the radiation resistance (Rrad) of your antenna,
which can be done using various text-book formulae, or using antenna
simulation software like EZNEC or similar. Then you measure the RF current
flowing in the antenna (Iant). The ERP is then Iant^2 x Rrad x 1.8 (1.8 is
the directivity of electrically small vertical or loop antennas, which in
practice is what all amateur 136kHz antennas are).

Method 2 is to measure the field strength some km from the antenna. The ERP
is then (E x d)^2 /49, where E is the field strength, d distance in metres.
This requires a calibrated antenna and measuring receiver, so is more
complicated to do.

Method 1 is simpler to do, but yields ERP results that tend to be lower than
those obtained by method 2. This is thought to be due to various combined
environmental effects on the antenna, which are not accounted for in the
simple calculation. So to get a more accurate and definitive figure, you
need to do method 2, but as far as compliance with licence conditions is
concerned, method 1 is a conservative way of checking.

Good luck in your efforts!

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU

----- Original Message -----
but From: "David Weinreich" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re Propagation report


Peter,

As an interested observer from the other side of the pond, how do you
determine that you are close to the ERP limit?? I'd be interested in knowing
as I am trying to do some pro-bono work for the ARRL on getting use of 137
kHz here in the USA.

Tnx & 73,

David Weinreich
WA2VUJ/3




The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact [email protected]


------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.420 / Virus Database: 270.14.5/2418 - Release Date: 10/06/09 18:34:00



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>