Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Olivia QSO

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: Olivia QSO
From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 01:36:17 -0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=UYyzirnSlXJdtYPd/xE9oQozAvmDJIE1uiEkXm7K/ocKyfI21XVWKVpi9C5vqPX+D+An945+P/5PjyzXgYuiX3t3hrgFBtvlxYm6UmCMDVHRefz+kUzE1O+OWnUYgh7SY1MT0RmER6/dajvN+sb/yQ+tknphYBtfeVKoNaN0r2o= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <74D73520414D46898D59598D727BFB0E@AGB>
References: <001201c96d29$7ec00550$a402a8c0@Inspiron> <74D73520414D46898D59598D727BFB0E@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Dear Graham, LF Group,

Thanks for our first QSO this evening. As keyboard-to-keyboard "chat" modes go, this has to be the best I have experienced so far at LF/MF. The 32 tone/1kHz sub-mode produced almost 100% copy provided the signal was audible - the somewhat slower 4 tone/250Hz setting was better still, only producing errors during short periods at the fading minima when the signal was completely inaudible and invisible on the spectrogram as well. I have always struggled to copy G0NDB before, but on this occasion we had a fairly lengthy QSO without any great difficulty. I think the main practical difficulty for random QSOs would be knowing that there was a signal present to decode - it would be sensible to have a calling frequency for future tests.

I would agree that the 1kHz bandwidth sub-mode is too wide for routine use in the present 500kHz band. But it does not violate the present licence conditions, and I think it is an interesting experiment to see if a relatively wide-band mode is an advantage for selective fading conditions on this band. Looking at the various menus in Fldigi, I see that Olivia can be configured for any combination of bandwidth from 125Hz to 2kHz, and 2 - 256 tones (I tried it - you can have 256 tones and 125Hz, or 2 tones in 2kHz, although how well it works is another matter...). It would be interesting to try back-to-back comparisons with varying parameters to test the possibilities of fast vs. slow, wide vs. narrow.

Cheers, Jim moritz
73 de M0BMU


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>