If certain ISPs incorrectly classifiy like this, I wonder if they
could be presented with a "Defamation of Character" claim... under
Human Rights legislation or whatever.
Andy G4JNT
www.g4jnt.com
2009/1/26 Alan Melia <[email protected]>:
> Hi Mark, well at least your ISP does not seem to be blacklisted, because
> some are still like Laurence who I think has had to use a different ISP,
> because that mail got through. The spambots at some ISPs have been made very
> aggressive recently as a result of the "Child Protection pressure" The VLF
> Group I sub to was rated as an "adult site" because on poster named his
> design "Little Cutie" (It will be interesting to see it this gets through
> !!) There have also been problems with some ISPs where a mesage has refered
> to the gender of a coax connector !! You might find it interesting to
> re-read you failed message for "double entendres"
>
> Cheers
> Alan G3NYK
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 8:26 AM
> Subject: LF: Censorship
>
>
> Seems that the spambots are censoring mail to this group
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>
> [email protected]
> SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
> host relay2.thorcom.net [193.82.59.130]: 550 This message scored 4.0
> spam points - rejected
>
> In essence my email said WSPR (and QRSS) are best at the top edge of the
> band. They will not interfere much with each other.
> My WSPR decoder and grabber is on 24/7 so an agreed frequency is needed for
> it to be most effective especially when I am away (a lot recently)
>
> Mark GM4ISM
>
>
>
|
