To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: RE: 137 kHz WSPR tests saturday morning |
From: | "Scholz, Marco " <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:31:43 -0000 |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | Acl4hcbbpkzF9kOrQrC3krHIGaxtNwAAHvYw |
Thread-topic: | 137 kHz WSPR tests saturday morning |
Good morning,
good reception of DF0WD
092600 18
-11 0.9 11 0 DF0WD JO42
27
092800 9 -20 0.6 0 0 M0BMU IO91 27 vy73
Marco
DD7PC in JN49ax From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: 17 January 2009 10:24 To: [email protected] Subject: LF: 137 kHz WSPR tests saturday morning Many thanks for the WSPR activity. To me, it was a nice way to compare two receiving sites. The first attempt to receive Jim at DF0WD showed: 0900 -7 0.5 0.137500 0 M0BMU IO91 27 (automatic uploading of spots to http://www.wsprnet.org/meptspots.php?mode=html&band=2190&limit=50&findcall=&findreporter=&sort=date was off then, and Jim seems to have gone QRT by now. At the same period, the SNR received at home (indoor loop) was -20 dB ... 13 dB less SNR than here at the club station, using the 200 meter wire antenna. What a difference ! I don't know exactly what the ERP is here at the moment (ground is frozen still), but comparing Jim's report to the MEPT database, it seems to be in the same region as M0BMU. Will keep sending at 25 % TX for a short while now. 73, Wolf DL4YHF ( @ df0wd, JO42FD) . -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: 137 kHz WSPR tests saturday morning, dl4yhf |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: LA on 600 mtrs, mal hamilton |
Previous by Thread: | LF: 137 kHz WSPR tests saturday morning, dl4yhf |
Next by Thread: | LF: 137 kHz WSPR tests saturday morning DF0WD & M0BMU, Dave G3WCB |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |