rather indicates he is Mal adroit ?



Bob K3DJC



 

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:07:45 +0000 John P-G

<[email protected]> writes:

> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:18:38 -0800

> Scott Tilley <[email protected]> wrote:

> 

> > o assuming your bluster is true and you are the world's best CW 

> op, 

> > your bandwidth is surly more than any digi mode currently in use 

> on

> > the band and you should either slow down or go QRT if you really

> > believe your logic.

> 

> Scott, it's even worse than that! 

> 

> Mal isn't often  to be observed moving his transmit frequency to

> match the other station, so his QSOs usually take up double the

> bandwidth than is needed, and on top of that he often operates on 2, 

> or

> 3, bands at once, and with more power than strictly needed for the 

> QSO

> in hand.

> 

> Talk about a spectrum hog.

> 

> If he's really keen on spectrum conservation he should practice what 

> he

> preaches - net accurately, ensure correct keying shape to minimise

> spectral occupancy of his CW signal and utilise the minimum 

> transmit

> power needed for each QSO. Never exceeding the 1W ERP limit,

> naturally.

> 

> At a lowly 12 wpm he must occupy almost 50Hz, how many WSPR mode

> transmissions could more usefully fit into that space? If, as usual, 

> he

> hasn't netted accurately, or at all, his QSO partner is also using

> another 50Hz elsewhere on the band.

> 

> People in glass houses should put the catapult down.

> 

> John

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

 

____________________________________________________________

Turn your passion into a profession.  Click here to find a film school near you.

http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/PnY6rw1TzjbTKMz5R6cKF12mmHIU13yovwrfcNykVHG4dBQ99ZaRp/