rather indicates he is Mal adroit ?
Bob K3DJC
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:07:45 +0000 John P-G
<[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:18:38 -0800
> Scott Tilley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > o assuming your bluster is true and you are the world's best CW
> op,
> > your bandwidth is surly more than any digi mode currently in use
> on
> > the band and you should either slow down or go QRT if you really
> > believe your logic.
>
> Scott, it's even worse than that!
>
> Mal isn't often to be observed moving his transmit frequency to
> match the other station, so his QSOs usually take up double the
> bandwidth than is needed, and on top of that he often operates on 2,
> or
> 3, bands at once, and with more power than strictly needed for the
> QSO
> in hand.
>
> Talk about a spectrum hog.
>
> If he's really keen on spectrum conservation he should practice what
> he
> preaches - net accurately, ensure correct keying shape to minimise
> spectral occupancy of his CW signal and utilise the minimum
> transmit
> power needed for each QSO. Never exceeding the 1W ERP limit,
> naturally.
>
> At a lowly 12 wpm he must occupy almost 50Hz, how many WSPR mode
> transmissions could more usefully fit into that space? If, as usual,
> he
> hasn't netted accurately, or at all, his QSO partner is also using
> another 50Hz elsewhere on the band.
>
> People in glass houses should put the catapult down.
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________
Turn your passion into a profession. Click here to find a film school near you.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/PnY6rw1TzjbTKMz5R6cKF12mmHIU13yovwrfcNykVHG4dBQ99ZaRp/
|
