Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: WSPR and CW

To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: LF: Re: Re: WSPR and CW
From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:14:01 -0000
References: <495466BF.9080402@yahoo.com> <49564E54.2060402@usa.net> <006501c96840$4ddd6380$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <49565AB6.1060002@usa.net> <008201c9684c$409e01f0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <49566FCD.5080208@usa.net>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
If you could not HEAR it, SEE it, or EAT it how did you know it was 
there????????
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alberto di Bene" <dibene@usa.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 6:11 PM
Subject: LF: Re: WSPR and CW


mal hamilton wrote:
Glad to hear ur ears are in good shape. QRS is a CW MODE just slower than
normal hand sent speed, QRS 1 - 3 is far superior to wspr. It can be read
off the screen when wspr will not print out. This is a fact I have observed it every time. WSPR is alright if you want to use it but it is certainly not
a superior mode.
g3kev
Well, everybody is entitled to his own ideas, no matter how wrong they 
are... {:-) {:-)
73  Alberto  I2PHD



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.0/1865 - Release Date: 12/26/2008 1:01 PM


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>