To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: WSPR and CW |
From: | Alberto di Bene <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:11:25 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <008201c9684c$409e01f0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <006501c96840$4ddd6380$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <[email protected]> <008201c9684c$409e01f0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) |
Z-usanet-msgid: | XID113mLAsLC6272X39 |
mal hamilton wrote: Glad to hear ur ears are in good shape. QRS is a CW MODE just slower than normal hand sent speed, QRS 1 - 3 is far superior to wspr. It can be read off the screen when wspr will not print out. This is a fact I have observed it every time. WSPR is alright if you want to use it but it is certainly not a superior mode.g3kev Well, everybody is entitled to his own ideas, no matter how wrong they are... {:-) {:-) 73 Alberto I2PHD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re: WSPR and CW, mal hamilton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: WSPR and CW, mal hamilton |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: WSPR and CW, mal hamilton |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: WSPR and CW, mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |