| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: WSPR and CW |
| From: | Alberto di Bene <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:11:25 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <008201c9684c$409e01f0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <006501c96840$4ddd6380$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <[email protected]> <008201c9684c$409e01f0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) |
| Z-usanet-msgid: | XID113mLAsLC6272X39 |
mal hamilton wrote: Glad to hear ur ears are in good shape. QRS is a CW MODE just slower than normal hand sent speed, QRS 1 - 3 is far superior to wspr. It can be read off the screen when wspr will not print out. This is a fact I have observed it every time. WSPR is alright if you want to use it but it is certainly not a superior mode.g3kev
Well, everybody is entitled to his own ideas, no matter how wrong they are...
{:-) {:-)
73 Alberto I2PHD
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re: WSPR and CW, mal hamilton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: WSPR and CW, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: WSPR and CW, mal hamilton |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: WSPR and CW, mal hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |