John,
Hartmut's readout showed an offset of -0.254 Hz. Assuming his calibration is perfectly correct, I might have just missed you, as I
had set my decoder's frequency tolerance parameter to only 0.2 Hz. On the other hand, my location and setup is generally several
dB's less sensitive than Hartmut's or Jean-Pierre's.
The closest Loran line from GRI 6731 is on 137438.71, but with 7.43 Hz line spacing, a Wolf 10 signal won't fit inbetween anyway.
Loran is not much of a problem here in South Germany as we are fairly far from the coast and the lines are weak.
Best wishes
Markus
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: LF: WD2XES WOLF
Jean-Pierre, Markus, Hartmut,
Thanks for looking. I was definitely on 137.441 (as proven by Hartmut's copy), but the frequency was chosen for Laurence in the
frozen wilds of Alaska, who did get some copy. There was likely a Loran-C problem in EU. I'll try to come up with a better
frequency for tonight.
Hartmut -- that was amazing. Thanks.
John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES
|
