Dear Rik,
Also heard the end of your QSO with Chris at 21.44 UTC and your next cq
call
at 21.48 UTC and at 21.58 UTC (in a slight qsb period here).
At 22.06 UTC You called GM4ISM (your signal weak, still some qsb). But I
got that GM4ISM was also weak at your QTH.
Nothing else heard until 22.18, now send this email.
Quite an interesting evening.
73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB
"Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]> schrieb:
> Dear Hajo,
>
> thanks for the report.
> Just worked ON4KTJ, but even here he was only 339 over abt 70km distance.
> His QTH is Ath (abt 50km SW of Brussels).
> Maybe southcoast G's can copy him.
>
> Anyway: my 14th station and 5th DXCC.
>
> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
>
> Quoting [email protected]:
>
> > Just heard weak signals from OR7T on 502,2 kHz in eastern Bavaria, QTH
> > JN68GN;
> > at 20.40 the end of a qso with ON4??, and
> >
> > at 20.44 cq d3e OR7T
> >
> > Paul-Hendrik, tnx for your explanations. I also feel that for the time
> > being 23.00 UTC will be the optimum time for EU dx. We both have the
> > same local summer time i guess.
> >
> > Nw back to the reiceiver.
> >
> > 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB
> >
> > "Paul-Henrik" <[email protected]> schrieb:
> >> 500kHz propagation from western europe sets in very late (early
> >> morning) here
> >> now, there is no complete nighttime darkness up here anymore so the D-layer
> >> gets very little rest. Midsummer is about a month away and it will be
> >> August
> >> before signals slowly start improving here again on MF.
> >>
> >> DI2AM was weak too at the time I had the first copy of Rik.
> >>
> >> 2200z is local midnight here and mid-path midnight will be almost one hour
> >> later.
> >>
> >> So in fact 2125z was still "early" copy of Rik here. I expect
> >> signals would have
> >> improved vastly from that. This is a very typical behaviour for
> >> DI2AM signals
> >> during recent weeks.
> >>
> >> The opposite situation:
> >>
> >> In mid winter I could copy GM4SLV 24/7 on the Shetland - Vaasa path
> >> during some
> >> longer tests we ran.
> >>
> >>
> >> Will keep an ear on 502.95kHz during the weekend when/if I'm in the shack
> >>
> >>
> >> 73
> >>
> >> Paul-Henrik / OH1LSQ
> >> Vaasa / KP03SD
> >>
> >>
> >> Quoting [email protected]:
> >>
> >> > This is a pity. According to Rik's time table I did not listen after
> >> > 21.00z
> >> >
> >> > But during the summer season this seems to be necessary. No problem for
> >> > me, I am retired.
> >> >
> >> > 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Paul-Henrik" <[email protected]> schrieb:
> >> > > Hear you calling CQ on 502.95kHz at 2125z
> >> > >
> >> > > Weak but readable, a Q4
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > 73's
> >> > >
> >> > > Paul-Henrik / OH1LSQ
> >> > > Vaasa / KP03SD
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Quoting Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Dear all,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I have been calling CQ once in a while last night (on 502.95 kHz) and
> >> > > > once I thought to hear a response near 501.9 kHz.
> >> > > > Unfortunately QRM is very high in the lower part of the band. Lowest
> >> > > > QRM level (at my location) is between 502.9 and 503.4 kHz.
> >> > > > I will try to be QRV on 600 m the next days from 19-21 UTC,
> >> > > > monitoring the band for activity and calling CQ every now and then.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I am running 250 Watt (= 2 A antenna current) into a 11m high and 25m
> >> > > > long T-antenna.
> >> > > > Calculated radiation resistance of the antenna is 0.4 Ohm, the
> >> > > > theoretical ERP should be around 3 Watt.
> >> > > > But I am afraid that the greenery surrounding the antenna absorbs a
> >> > > > good part of it.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
>
>
>
|
