Lbr Roland,
danke für den Hinweis. Aber im Grunde war ich froh, daß für Hörempfang
die 505 kHz so schön leer war. Erst später kam erst OK0EMW hinzu, wie
ich durch Auszählen der ersten Zeichenlängen feststellen konnte.
Nichts für ungut.
73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB
"Roland Bruestle" <[email protected]> schrieb:
> nur zu Info
> DI2AT ist wegen Urlaub abgeschalten.
> Wahrscheinlich geht es erst im Sptenber wieder weiter, da zu wenig
> Rückmeldungen kamem (ca- eine / Monat)
> Gruß
> Roland DI2AT/ DL3NDR
>
> [email protected] schrieb:
> > Dear Rik,
> >
> > tried to copy You by ear tonight but nil.
> >
> > Even DI2AM cannot be heard before 20.00 UTC here in eastern Bavaria,
> > JN68GN.
> >
> > But I will listen the following evenings too.
> >
> > 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB
> >
> > "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]> schrieb:
> >
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> I have been calling CQ once in a while last night (on 502.95 kHz) and
> >> once I thought to hear a response near 501.9 kHz.
> >> Unfortunately QRM is very high in the lower part of the band. Lowest
> >> QRM level (at my location) is between 502.9 and 503.4 kHz.
> >> I will try to be QRV on 600 m the next days from 19-21 UTC,
> >> monitoring the band for activity and calling CQ every now and then.
> >>
> >> I am running 250 Watt (= 2 A antenna current) into a 11m high and 25m
> >> long T-antenna.
> >> Calculated radiation resistance of the antenna is 0.4 Ohm, the
> >> theoretical ERP should be around 3 Watt.
> >> But I am afraid that the greenery surrounding the antenna absorbs a
> >> good part of it.
> >>
> >> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
> >>
> >>
> >> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
|
