To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: M0BMU WOLF Beacon |
From: | Alberto di Bene <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:39:10 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <001501c8690d$0e706f40$410d7ad5@w4o8m9> <001501c869db$a296b840$97188351@w4o8m9> <000d01c86aa8$96510040$ae197ad5@w4o8m9> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) |
Z-usanet-msgid: | XID131mBiVnm0235X40 |
Johan H. Bodin wrote: This sampling rate is re-sampled to a "standard" rate by Windows when listening through the soundcard, and by the VAC software (Virtual Audio Cable) when routing the signal to other programs such as Wolf. Unfortunately, the VAC software seems to use a quite sloppy algorithm for resampling, probably to reduce the CPU load. At some output sampling rates, there are distorsion products that look like some kind of "in-band aliasing" and these are not more than 40dB down or so :-( Maybe this percent of THD goes unnoticed by "normal" VAC users who listen to mainsream music (which is usually 100% distorsion anyway ;-) ) Yes, I can confirm that VAC has a very bad resampler. You can hear the artifacts easily, even on voice recordings. A good suggestion for Nico would be to implement the resampler inside the Perseus software... 73 Alberto I2PHD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: LF 2200M. PE1RRF Beaconing, Ko Versteeg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: M0BMU WOLF Beacon, Johan H. Bodin |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: M0BMU WOLF Beacon, Johan H. Bodin |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: M0BMU WOLF Beacon, Johan H. Bodin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |