Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: M0BMU WOLF Beacon

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: M0BMU WOLF Beacon
From: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:39:10 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <001501c8690d$0e706f40$410d7ad5@w4o8m9> <001501c869db$a296b840$97188351@w4o8m9> <000d01c86aa8$96510040$ae197ad5@w4o8m9> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
Z-usanet-msgid: XID131mBiVnm0235X40

Johan H. Bodin wrote:

This sampling rate is re-sampled to a "standard" rate by
Windows when listening through the soundcard, and by the VAC software
(Virtual Audio Cable) when routing the signal to other programs such as
Wolf. Unfortunately, the VAC software seems to use a quite sloppy
algorithm for resampling, probably to reduce the CPU load. At some
output sampling rates, there are distorsion products that look like some
kind of "in-band aliasing" and these are not more than 40dB down or so
:-( Maybe this percent of THD goes unnoticed by "normal" VAC users who
listen to mainsream music (which is usually 100% distorsion anyway ;-) )

Yes, I can confirm that VAC has a very bad resampler. You can hear the artifacts easily, even on voice recordings. A good suggestion for Nico would be to implement the resampler inside the Perseus software...

73  Alberto  I2PHD



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>