Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Fenceline longwire |
| From: | Mike WE0H <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:19:51 -0600 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gWU1gemFJJG0wQx7j5sRLgdi52kk5pBrGlmB6a2YcP1Ld1SGd3l6bjeSYJAWpbB1dpRyen8YNazRAKdtmw+IvMJDaIrpIHRZh7Lwc6do6kpIm9NQmkKZVRrVXY1esDwzP2Euct/CmbZKZl1K+EiJ0fkyXVye/33BI1rjCe2vNVk= ; |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <000501c85c3d$4fa2f820$0b01a8c0@weazle> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) |
What if JB put a big loading coil in the fence wire? I would think that would work just like our loaded short verticals...Sure there would be losses but we have losses in our transmitting antennas also. Mike WE0H Rik Strobbe wrote: J.B. , I simulated the fence wire with MMANA.On HF (80m, 40m) I got the expected (bi)directivity and low offset angle. But on 500kHz the horizontal pattern is almost omnidirectional and the offset angle is 78 degrees. It seems that (at least in theory) even 1200 foot is too short to be long on 500kHz ...Or does MMANA not work properly ? 73, Rik ON7YD |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Fenceline longwire, Alan Melia |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Fenceline longwire, Johan H. Bodin |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: Fenceline longwire, Chris Trayner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Fenceline longwire, Alan Melia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |