To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: CLASS E |
From: | John GM4SLV <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:17:23 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <003301c82c25$718801d0$16e4fc3e@g3kev> |
References: | <000c01c82b85$97ec0010$2ee4fc3e@g3kev> <[email protected]> <000201c82bc1$3c442300$2be4fc3e@g3kev> <[email protected]> <003301c82c25$718801d0$16e4fc3e@g3kev> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:00:27 -0000 "hamilton mal" <[email protected]> wrote: > You must have missed my article in the early days about my class E > and all the parameters, and especially monitoring the waveform V for > correct operation. I didn't miss it Mal... Nowhere have I seen your reported: DC Input Volts/Current RF Output Power Efficiency Others have replied to you with their own measured efficiency vs power so perhaps you can furnish us with the same. After all you've certainly made some exhaustive optimisations of the output tuning components to achieve the perfect class E drain waveforms. John |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Cross-band etiquette, John GM4SLV |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Cross-band etiquette, John GM4SLV |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: CLASS E, hamilton mal |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: CLASS E, hamilton mal |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |