Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing...

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing...
From: "Gw3UEP" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:28:15 +0100
Delivered-to: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]> <002401c7cde9$bf9a8f40$6f3b8351@w4o8m9> <000a01c7cdfe$78702070$8ac3e150@o> <002701c7ce09$247dcc00$09228351@w4o8m9>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Sent. Rog.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing...

Dear Rog,
 
Yes, please send the mp3 - that would be interesting to listen to. The noise level here is a few dB higher in the E-W direction on the loop than it is N-S. Mal's signal is about 9 - 10uV/m here, usually around 20dB above the noise in a 300Hz bandwidth - all other things being  equal, I would at least expect to see GW4HXO on the spectrogram, but there is no trace at the moment here.
 
Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU
----- Original Message -----
From: Gw3UEP
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing...

Jim,
Re day-time land-path cw sigs; they are there but the limiting factor is site noise-levels.
I have solid/steady copy of kev but with little noise-margin - a few dBs of noise would kill it.
Also, fluctuating noise-levels can give the impression of qsb on weak sigs.
I have an mp3 [280k] recording of mal/chris at 10am, if you're interested? [~240mls].
73, Rog.
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing...

Dear Mike, LF Group,

No sign of your signal here in IO91VR north of London yet. I was watching my
own beacon signal on GM4SLV's handy screen grabber overnight. There was
pretty consistent reception without much fading while the path was in
darkness, and nothing at all in daylight. I have not heard anything much
over 2-300km during the day time here; to me it really seems that the ground
wave signal levels "fall off a cliff" much beyond that over land, although
the fact that GM4SLV, G3KEV and other stations near the coast can hear each
other during daylight seems to confirm substantially greater ground-wave
range over the sea. All the DX reports on my beacon signals so far have been
during darkness; and the distant signals I have heard have been then too, so
it looks like the ionosphere is only really cooperating at night.Any
possibility of operating your beacon after dark would be welcome here - the
503.8 frequency is fine by me!

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Probert" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 10:26 AM
Subject: RE: LF: [ 500]; Two GW's Testing...


> Beacon on 503.8 now @ 10.25 BST. Is this frequency clear?
> Hope that helps
> 73
> Mike GW4HXO

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>