Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: M0BMU ERP on 500k

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: M0BMU ERP on 500k
From: "Johan H. Bodin" <jh.bodin@telia.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:36:03 +0200
Delivered-to: daveyxm@gmail.com
In-reply-to: <20070615001329.6ikxlepiewskckg0@webmail3.kuleuven.be>
References: <001f01c7ae26$3474ab40$c2137ad5@w4o8m9> <20070614125512.BD7D431E702@smtps01.kuleuven.be> <46718D94.8050303@telia.com> <20070615001329.6ikxlepiewskckg0@webmail3.kuleuven.be>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)
Rik Strobbe wrote:

Looking at the patterns:
am I right to conclude that not-so-perfect ground will only attenuate the surface wave (radiated at 0°) but will not affect skywave (or even improve it a bit)?
I don't know... But, experience from experiments, software simulations and
reading a lot of books converge into the fact that vertical antennas over
non-perfect ground do not radiate well at zero elevation. I believe it
has something to do with the GND beeing a not-so-perfect mirror which,
in addition to beeing lossy, also has some phase shift in its reflection
coefficient. I guess...

I think that most of this attenuation happens in the near field region
which I believe is exactly what Jim M0BMU has found in his experiments;
the FS falls off almost linearly with distance but it is a few dBs
"too low". An FSM antenna at 2m height is below 1 degree elevation
already at 114m distance from the TX (assuming that the Earth is flat,
isn't it? ;-) )

73
Johan SM6LKM


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>