Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: Re: PAs

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: PAs
From: "Uwe Wensauer" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:56:09 +0200
Delivered-to: [email protected]
References: <44894231.30866.D42969@localhost><00b601c68baa$e8cf78d0$26180d54@traceydlqceh0p> <[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]> <002101c6910f$d5868e20$0300a8c0@LAPTOP> <000e01c6912b$003878c0$c2b66dcb@cobaltxp>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hello  Murray,

I assume that this message was not for me

But on the other hand, I am highly intersted in Building a LF- TX  You
metioned in the letter.
At present time I struggling in programming a Attiny 2313 as a replacement
for AT90S2313.

73
Uwe, DK1KQ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Murray ZL1BPU" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:55 AM
Subject: LF: Re: Re: PAs


> Uwe,
>
> It certainly looks like 2nd harmonic problems to me too, probably
linearity
> (gain) imbalance. Another thing you will have discovered is that with the
> harmonic information Peter mentioned, the SWR meter or bridge (if you use
> one) won't give good nulls, because the harmonic content won't be matched
at
> the antenna tuner.
>
> Either you need a rather better low pass filter, or to sort out the
> non-linearity. My LF TX operates in Class D (can't get more nonlinear than
> that) but the waveform is nicely sinusoidal at the antenna. Mind you,
third
> harmonic is my problem, not second.
>
> 73,
> Murray ZL1BPU
>
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>