Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Rugby LORAN measurement? |
| From: | "Peter Martinez" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 9 Apr 2006 19:13:29 -0000 |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| References: | <[email protected]> <000601c65582$aefd8ec0$cada380a@acer5gi5q0ubzj> <[email protected]> <004501c657e5$b779fbf0$0300a8c0@LAPTOP> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
From G3PLX: I don't think the presence of the spurious emission (near 60kHz) from the LORAN transmitter would cause any trouble to MSF itself. A quick calculation says that the nearest spurii from the Rugby LORAN transmitter to the MSF transmission would be respectively 8.9139804 Hz low and 5.94265 Hz high of 60kHz, and probably a long long way down on the main 60kHz carrier. Of course that doesn't say that there isn't some disturbance from the LORAN transmitter to the MSF transmitter due to non-linear effects arising because of the proximity of the two transmitters to each other. The NPL people might be more worried about that than the far-off sidebands which bother us up here. But if there were effects like this, the solution wouldn't help us at all. 73 Peter |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Noblesse oblige, Jean-L. RAULT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: RE: Noblesse oblige, Dave G3WCB |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Rugby LORAN measurement?, Stewart Bryant |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Rugby LORAN measurement?, Stewart Bryant |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |