Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT
From:	[email protected]
Date:	Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:22:35 EDT
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Jay,

counting pixels ... well I guess the other station is on 18.6 kHz not 18.5. Can you see something there? There are several US transmitters listed as "inactive" on this QRG.

73 de Markus

In einer eMail vom 21.04.2006 01:12:02 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt [email protected]:

How accurate are the WWLLN frequency scales? In particular does 18.5 fall on 18.5?

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jay Rusgrove LF: Re: 18.5 kHz in CT, MIKE REID Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, markusvester Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jose Manuel LF: IK5ZPV...report..., Dave G3WCB Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, MarkusVester Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jay Rusgrove Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, MarkusVester Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, MarkusVester <= Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jay Rusgrove Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Dave Brown LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jay Rusgrove Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jean-Pierre Godet LF: RE: 18.5 kHz in CT, Gary - G4WGT LF: Re: RE: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jay Rusgrove LF: Re: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jean-Pierre Godet LF: Re: Re: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jay Rusgrove Re: LF: Re: Re: 18.5 kHz in CT, John Andrews LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, MIKE REID

Previous by Date:	LF: Top loading coil at ground level?, Dick Rollema
Next by Date:	Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jay Rusgrove
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, MarkusVester
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jay Rusgrove
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]