Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT
From:	"Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>
Date:	Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:54:56 -0400
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
References:	<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Markus

Only receiving 18.1 here at the moment...

Jay



----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT


Jay,

counting pixels ... well I guess the other station is on 18.6 kHz not 18.5.
Can you see something there? There are several US transmitters listed as
"inactive" on this QRG.

73 de Markus

In einer eMail vom 21.04.2006 01:12:02 Westeuropï¿½ische Sommerzeit schreibt
[email protected]:

> How accurate are the WWLLN frequency scales? In particular does 18.5 fall
> on 18.5?

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jay Rusgrove LF: Re: 18.5 kHz in CT, MIKE REID Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, markusvester Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jose Manuel LF: IK5ZPV...report..., Dave G3WCB Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, MarkusVester Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jay Rusgrove Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, MarkusVester Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, MarkusVester Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jay Rusgrove <= Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Dave Brown LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jay Rusgrove Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jean-Pierre Godet LF: RE: 18.5 kHz in CT, Gary - G4WGT LF: Re: RE: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jay Rusgrove LF: Re: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jean-Pierre Godet LF: Re: Re: 18.5 kHz in CT, Jay Rusgrove Re: LF: Re: Re: 18.5 kHz in CT, John Andrews LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, MIKE REID LF: RE: Re: RE: 18.5 kHz in CT, Gary - G4WGT

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, MarkusVester
Next by Date:	LF: Top loading coil at ground level?, Dick Rollema
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, MarkusVester
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT, Dave Brown
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]