To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Re: Real QRP tests |
From: | "Peter Martinez" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:30:27 -0000 |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
References: | <030820061539.18005.440EFA980004BD4A0000465522007613940B97010D0A020E06979D0E03@comcast.net> <01dd01c642d8$e6cbc180$0300a8c0@LAPTOP> <002701c642db$d1ebcb40$045bfea9@d4f8d8> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Andy:OK, let's give it a try at -23dBm (5uW) over the 400km path between us. I can handle any decimal part of a Hz now, not just proper fractions of a Hz, so long as I can leave the system running continuously. GPS-lock would be fine - I don't want to use up the Caesium. I am not familiar with the band-plan, so you choose a frequency and give it to me with as many decimal places as you can. Contact me off-reflector and we can set it up. 73 Peter |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Real QRP tests, Andy Talbot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: Real QRP tests continued, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Real QRP tests, Andy Talbot |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Real QRP tests continued, Andy Talbot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |