To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: TA 12 FEB 06 |
From: | John Andrews <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:40:33 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:36:50 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <43F09152.30088.16449A1@localhost> |
References: | <43F09152.30088.16449A1@localhost> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) |
Mike Mike Dennison wrote:Using 136.318 as the center of the window, an Argo 30-second screen would display 136.315 to 136.321 kHz. For the eastern U.S. and Canada, you should avoid Loran lines at: 136,315.261 136,315.346 136,315.789 136,320.281Otherwise, everything is fair game. This "window" was chosen for Loran-friendliness in eastern North America, and is not as clean in the west. It should be pretty good for your target audience, however. <g> John Andrews, W1TAG It would help to know what frequency 'window' is used by those monitoring. We arer all clustered close to CT1DRP. How far out can wego and still stay on screen? |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: TA 12 FEB 06, Jay Rusgrove |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: TA, Jean-Pierre Méré |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: TA 12 FEB 06, Jay Rusgrove |
Next by Thread: | LF: Loop clarification, J. B. Weazle McCreath |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |