Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

LF: AW: Re: LF TA

from [Thomas Eckart] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: AW: Re: LF TA
From: "Thomas Eckart" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:55:49 +0100
Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:57:00 +0000
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <002101c62744$4a617c40$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Jay,
ok and thanks for response to my question.
So I think I'll use the 136319.5 khz for test.
 
Best 73' hope that you will see me! :-)
 
Tom DL4EAU
 
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]Im Auftrag von Jay Rusgrove
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 16:29
An: [email protected]
Betreff: LF: Re: LF TA

Tom
 
136319 or 136320 should be fine here in terms of no interference - the closest loran line is at 320.3 and will not be a problem. Don't know if anyone has already spoken for those frequencies, though.
 
Jay, W1VD
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 6:56 AM
Subject: LF: LF TA

Hi all,

I want to test TA this night.
What is a good frequency?
Is 136.319KHz or 136.320KHz a good choice?

I have made a test this morning. At 04:20h UTC I TX only one EAU in
QRSS30

73' Tom DL4EAU



[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: Can't see the wood for the trees, Andy
Next by Date:  LF: Re: LF TA, John Andrews
Previous by Thread:  LF: Re: LF TA, Jay Rusgrove
Next by Thread:  LF: RE: AW: Re: LF TA, Dave G3WCB
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]