Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

LF: Re: LF TA

from [Jay Rusgrove] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: LF TA
From: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 10:29:28 -0500
Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:14:10 +0000
Envelope-to: [email protected]
References: <020120060225.29276.43E01C11000B4FD10000725C22064244130B97010D0A020E06979D0E03@comcast.net> <[email protected]> <001001c62721$6fa49960$67b0fea9@lark> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Tom
 
136319 or 136320 should be fine here in terms of no interference - the closest loran line is at 320.3 and will not be a problem. Don't know if anyone has already spoken for those frequencies, though.
 
Jay, W1VD
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 6:56 AM
Subject: LF: LF TA

Hi all,

I want to test TA this night.
What is a good frequency?
Is 136.319KHz or 136.320KHz a good choice?

I have made a test this morning. At 04:20h UTC I TX only one EAU in
QRSS30

73' Tom DL4EAU



[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: Can't see the wood for the trees, Andy
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Can't see the wood for the trees, Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ
Previous by Thread:  LF: LF TA, [email protected]
Next by Thread:  LF: AW: Re: LF TA, Thomas Eckart
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]