Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: RE: AW: Re: LF TA

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: RE: AW: Re: LF TA
From: "Dave G3WCB" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 20:40:21 -0000
Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:39:54 +0000
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi, Tom.
 
Caught this from you this morning at about 04:20 utc...
 
73 Dave G3WCB IO91RM
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Thomas Eckart
Sent: 01 February 2006 15:56
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: AW: Re: LF TA

Hi Jay,
ok and thanks for response to my question.
So I think I'll use the 136319.5 khz for test.
 
Best 73' hope that you will see me! :-)
 
Tom DL4EAU
 
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]Im Auftrag von Jay Rusgrove
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 16:29
An: [email protected]
Betreff: LF: Re: LF TA

Tom
 
136319 or 136320 should be fine here in terms of no interference - the closest loran line is at 320.3 and will not be a problem. Don't know if anyone has already spoken for those frequencies, though.
 
Jay, W1VD
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 6:56 AM
Subject: LF: LF TA

Hi all,

I want to test TA this night.
What is a good frequency?
Is 136.319KHz or 136.320KHz a good choice?

I have made a test this morning. At 04:20h UTC I TX only one EAU in
QRSS30

73' Tom DL4EAU



GIF image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>