Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: TA 26 JAN 06 XKO |
| From: | Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:04:59 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:04:38 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
| In-reply-to: | <002001c621b1$48645220$2101a8c0@pcroelof> |
| References: | <005801c6218c$dffbd880$0100a8c0@jpmpcportable> <002001c621b1$48645220$2101a8c0@pcroelof> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) |
Roelof, > Looking at my overnight SpecLab captures, there appeared to be a > substantial difference in background noise. It was much stronger from> 02:00 - 05:00 and from 06:00 - 06:30 UTC. Have other listeners > observed > this also? > At the time a massive thunderstorm was lurking over the Mediterranean. > Could this have caused the increase in band noise?I'm using several K9AY loops here with a main -3 db lobe of about 145 degrees. Mainly in use for T/A on 137kHz is the antenna pointing at 310°, because with other antennas pointing more southerly the noise level is much higher, especially when there are T-storms over the Mediterranean. So I believe your higher noise level is caused by the T-storms. 73 Hartmut |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: TA best yet, Jay Rusgrove |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: LMS wanted, Mike Dennison |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: TA last night, Jean-Pierre Godet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: TA 26 JAN 06 XKO, Roelof Bakker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |