To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Lost current in a coil |
From: | Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:04:38 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <4225CA7F.15619.BBCBA7@localhost> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2-cvs |
Hello Dick, Mike it is indeed a "phase thing".If a 100 W TX causes a 2 A current in a 5mH coil (XL = 4270 Ohm) and thus causes a voltage of 8540 V over the coil then at the "hot" end the phase difference between U and I is 89.7 degrees : P = U * I * cos(x) thus x = arccos(P/(U*I)) (assuming no coil losses) At the "cold" end voltage and current are in phase. 73, Rik To Mike and All At 15:15 2-3-05, G3XDV wrote: >A useful test to see whether radiation causes the loss, would be to >completely screen the loading coil.Because the size of the coil is so small, expressed in wavelength, radiation is negligible.>I have never understood why, if the current is thought to stay the >same from top to bottom of a coil, the voltage is much bigger at the >top? Is this a phase thing?The voltage at the bottom is equal to the output voltage of the transmitter; at e.g. 100W this is 70V over 50 ohm.As an example let the inductance of the coil be 5mH. Then itsreactance at 136kHz is 4270 ohm.With an aerial current of for instance 2A flowing through the coilthe voltage at the top of the coil will be2 * 4270 = 8541V higher than at the bottom. So total voltage at the top will be 70 + 8541 = 8610V. 73, Dick, PA0SE |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Lost current in a coil, Dick Rollema |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Big Bad Amps -or " Practical use of Wilkinson combiner", Scott Tilley |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Lost current in a coil, Dick Rollema |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Lost current in a coil, Dick Rollema |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |