To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re[2]: LF: Loading Coils |
From: | "John Rabson" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:19:51 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On 19/11/2004 at 08:13 Andy wrote: When it comes to calculations, the most useful ability is not to be ableto caculate it exactly, caculator or no, but to quickly be able to estimate a ball park answer or approximation.Who needs to know that 22uH at 137kHz has 18.93 ohms reactance. Its quicker to think " a bit more than 20 times a bit less than 0.14,times 6-and-a-bit... is 2.8 times 6-and-a-bit , so call it 18 ohms" And they don't teach that in schools - and never have done, to my knowledge! Andy G4JNT I seem to recall a telecommunications professor (Ken Cattermole?) who expected his MSc students at least to have a feel for whether a result was of the right order of magnitude. John G3PAI |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Loading Coils, M. J. Powell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Telephone wires, OSBORN, Chris |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Loading Coils, M. J. Powell |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: LF: Loading Coils, captbrian |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |