To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals |
From: | "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:26:59 +0000 (GMT) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Stewart Bryant wrote: However anomolous results can also be of interest. For example, it is not uncommon for researchers to sweep minor, irritating, results under the table. Any anomalous results are of grate interest! But usualy it is due to experimental mistake. It is very rare when it is real evidence that common theorys should be reworking. So one should be very carefull when requre to modify the well testing theory. This is the only point... 73 de RA9MB/Alex http://www.qsl.net/ra9mb |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Beaconing, jannsen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Beaconing, Dick Rollema |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals, Stewart Bryant |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals, G4gvw |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |