Well...
That may not always be the case.
If experimentation disagrees with theory you need to check that everything is
accounted for, before assuming the theory is wrong and reworking it.
It is too easy to overlook some seemingly trivial little thing or ignore the
seemingly obvious.
Like baluns on antenna measurements - just as an example.
I've often found that theory based on back of envelope calculations, made from
first principles, has this annoying habit of often being surprisingly accurate.
Andy 'JNT
-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart Bryant [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: 2004/07/23 09:12
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals
Quite right. Experimental evidence is the only way to resolve the issue.
If the experiment agrees with theory, then that is good. If it does not,
then it is the theory that needs to be extended or abandoned.
- Stewart G3YSX
|
