Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: Loops v Verticals |
| From: | Alberto di Bene <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:16:36 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
Andy wrote: You just beated me in saying that. Look at the EH antenna, where a bunch of empirists pretend to rewrite the Maxwell's equations, on the basis of "a new theory of the electromagnetic field", which, unfortunately, noone of them has been able to put on paper using the language ofWell... That may not always be the case.If experimentation disagrees with theory you need to check that everything is accounted for, before assuming the theory is wrong and reworking it.[...] science, mathematics. 73 Alberto I2PHD |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals, Andy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: Loops v Verticals, captbrian |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals, Andy |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Loops v Verticals, captbrian |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |