Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: Loops v Verticals

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Loops v Verticals
From: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:01:05 +0100
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
I disagree. To the best of my knowledge the E-H antennas never demonstrated
anything more than one would expect from what they were.;  ie short
antennas with inductive  centre loading and capacitative end loading ..

They fitted normal theory quite well as did the ephemeral "fractal" antenna.

Bryan G3GVB

----- Original Message -----
From: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 2:16 PM
Subject: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals

Andy wrote:

>That may not always be the case.
>If experimentation disagrees with theory you need to check that
everything is
>accounted for, before assuming the theory is wrong and reworking it.
You just beated me in saying that. Look at the EH antenna, where a bunch
of empirists pretend
to rewrite the Maxwell's equations, on the basis of "a new theory of the
electromagnetic field",
which, unfortunately, noone of them has been able to put on paper using
the language of
science, mathematics.

73  Alberto  I2PHD

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>