To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: VDC source with microvolt resolution |
From: | Alberto di Bene <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 13 May 2004 17:35:47 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <007901c438fd$7c478600$0702a8c0@parissn2> |
References: | <[email protected]> <003301c438f8$97eaaa40$511297d4@oemcomputer> <007901c438fd$7c478600$0702a8c0@parissn2> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
Hi Stewart, another interesting suggestion to add to the "bag of tricks" for this project ! Thanks. 73 Alberto I2PHD ------------------------------ Stewart Nelson wrote: Hi Alberto, The filtering requirements are less onerous if the dithering frequency components are maximized, e.g. by a DDA algorithm. In Johan's example, add 442 to a variable each main PWM cycle. If the result is less than 1024, send 705 to the PWM. Otherwise, send 706 and subtract 1024 from the variable. This results in a sequence of 705, 705, 706, 705, 706, 705, etc. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: VO1NA Schedule, Joe Craig |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: RE: LF: RE: Attn. PAøSE, Dick Rollema |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: VDC source with microvolt resolution, Stewart Nelson |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: VDC source with microvolt resolution, Johan Bodin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |