LF: Re: DCF39

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: DCF39

from [Vernall]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: Re: DCF39
From:	"Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 11 Apr 2004 09:15:36 +1200
References:	<000e01c41e6d$9e2e9ce0$274136d2@mcalevey> <[email protected]> <001d01c41e70$2c3b22e0$274136d2@mcalevey> <000001c41f39$b5825130$f92537d2@mcalevey>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hi all,

A signal on 138.83 kHz got stronger approaching ZL sunrise.  A weak trace
started from about 1715 UTC.  See the 1854 UTC capture (which includes
scales and time) for 10 second dot length.  It looks like 10 second data
bursts are there when it was strongest (left side of the line on the
attachment).  Sunrise is nominally at capture time.  I did get a weak trace
for some time after sunrise.

73, Bob ZL2CA

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: DCF39 again, McAlevey Re: LF: DCF39 again, Rik Strobbe Re: LF: DCF39 again, McAlevey LF: DCF39 in Wellington, Vernall LF: Pic of capture, Vernall Re: LF: DCF39 again, James Moritz LF: DCF39, McAlevey LF: Re: DCF39, Vernall <= LF: vo1na sunrise, rn6bn Re: LF: DCF39, rn6bn Re: LF: DCF39, F6CWN Re[2]: LF: DCF39, rn6bn LF: WD2XES 137.7775, John Andrews LF: RE: WD2XES 137.7775, WE0H LF: a step further towards 136kHz??????, Dick LF: Re: DCF39 again...definitely !!, Alan Melia

Previous by Date:	LF: DCF39, McAlevey
Next by Date:	LF: vo1na sunrise, rn6bn
Previous by Thread:	LF: DCF39, McAlevey
Next by Thread:	LF: vo1na sunrise, rn6bn
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]