LF: DCF39 in Wellington

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: DCF39 in Wellington
From:	"Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date:	Sat, 10 Apr 2004 08:57:40 +1200
Cc:	"McAlevey" <[email protected]>
References:	<000e01c41e6d$9e2e9ce0$274136d2@mcalevey> <[email protected]> <001d01c41e70$2c3b22e0$274136d2@mcalevey>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hi all,

I checked overnight with 60 second dot length, and did get a signal on
138.83 kHz, but it seems not as good as Mike ZL4OL reports (he is about 550
km SW of me).  Signals were first detected at about 1620 UTC, got fairly
strong by 1815, and ended around 1900 (my sunrise).  I got a "line" with a
bandwidth of about 0.2 Hz.

I'll check again in subsequent nights with 10 second dot length.

73, Bob ZL2CA

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: DCF39 again, McAlevey Re: LF: DCF39 again, Rik Strobbe Re: LF: DCF39 again, McAlevey LF: DCF39 in Wellington, Vernall <= LF: Pic of capture, Vernall Re: LF: DCF39 again, James Moritz LF: DCF39, McAlevey LF: Re: DCF39, Vernall LF: vo1na sunrise, rn6bn Re: LF: DCF39, rn6bn Re: LF: DCF39, F6CWN Re[2]: LF: DCF39, rn6bn LF: WD2XES 137.7775, John Andrews LF: RE: WD2XES 137.7775, WE0H

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: DCF39 again, McAlevey
Next by Date:	Re: LF: DCF39 again, James Moritz
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: DCF39 again, McAlevey
Next by Thread:	LF: Pic of capture, Vernall
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]