Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: PA0SE Field Srength Meter for 137 kHz

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: PA0SE Field Srength Meter for 137 kHz
From: "Eric KD5UWL" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:59:40 -0600 (CST)
In-reply-to: <014401c3b29e$1babb2c0$15309bd2@vaiosn>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Ahhh .. excellent. Sorry -- I don't use html email clients for these reflectors and missed the distinction. I did, however, read the )2 as ) ** 2 or )^2 which is what was intended. I just didn't see the difference in the two as written without the benefit of HTML.

Thanks for the clarification and sorry for the confusion,
Eric



On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Stewart Nelson wrote:

Hi Eric and all,

Dick's post, made with Eudora, contained this HTML fragment:

The correct formula is:<br><br>
P = 0.0111(E *d)</font><font size=1><sup>2</sup></font><font size=3> in which
...

Depending on your mail reader and/or browser, the superscript 2 may not
have displayed correctly.

The correct formula is: P = 0.0111 * (E * d) ** 2
or P equals 0.0111 times ((E times d) squared)

Hope this is clear.

73,

Stewart

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric KD5UWL" <[email protected]>
To: "LF-Group" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: LF: PA0SE Field Srength Meter for 137 kHz


> On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Dick Rollema wrote:
>
> > produces a certain field strength is wrongly given as
> > P = 0.0111(E * d)2.
> >
> > The correct formula is:
> >
> > P = 0.0111(E *d)2 in which:
>
> Hi, Dick,
>
> Sorry -- I don't see the difference.  Did you include the wrong one?
>
> 73
> Eric
>
>
>






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>