Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: Re: CE

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: CE
From: "Dave Pick" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:52:41 +0100
References: <000301c30033$554c4620$1cd1fc3e@l8p8y6> <004801c3004e$817e6820$2602a8c0@WorkGroup> <003301c30050$fffa8e20$09dc9384@jka>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
The only thing wrong with this is that you don't know whether you've
stumbled on part of a QSO or a call... although it is a technique I have
used for years (I rarely call CQ EXCEPT on LF!).

I liked the "KA" idea. I also agree with Mike's suggestion of "Q" for
quicker and "S" for slower.

Dave G3YXM.


It would seem to me that just sending one's callsign followed by "K" would
be an invitation for anyone to go ahead. The "K" would differentiate this
from a beacon where no command is given.

John Andrews, W1TAG










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>