Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: Re: REAL CW

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: REAL CW
From: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 17:14:46 +0100
References: <000c01c30692$f02d5340$3ae4fc3e@l8p8y6> <001601c3071d$302ce340$2602a8c0@WorkGroup> <000701c3072b$2c510040$33e086d4@erica>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>

----- Original Message -----
From: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2003 11:44 AM
Subject: LF: Re: Re: REAL CW


>
> I was working newcomer John, G3JRL, in Weymouth, who was 549. During the
QSO
> someone whose callsign is old enough that he should know better called
CQ
> twice over the top at S9. He then seemingly deliberately wobbled his VFO
> back and forth across the frequency, defeating my attempts to use
filters
to
> fix the problem.
>
> Does that sound familiar to some of the old hands on 136kHz?

Yes it does. It was that sort of practice that caused John, G4GVC, to give
up LF some years ago.
This is strange coming from the COMIC man, who just admitted in a recent
message that he  works CW in the QRS part of the band creating HAVOC, also
pse check yiour Decca keying, for key clicks, not nice for others on the
band trying to work weak dx stations. Thank You de G3KEV


Regards,
Peter, G3LDO

e-mail <[email protected]>

Web <http://web.ukonline.co.uk/g3ldo>







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>