To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Argo V1 build 132 |
From: | "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 6 Jan 2003 21:29:24 -0000 |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Isn't the most logical one YYYY/MM/dd ?
Does anyone use this format routinely ?
Andy G4JNT----- Original Message ----- From: Dexter McIntyre <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 5:39 PM Subject: Re: LF: Argo V1 build 132 Looks great Alberto!>>Alberto di Bene wrote: >> I used this format : MMM, dd, yyyy I thought sure you would be the logical dd,MMM,yy type :) W4DEX |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Argo V1 build 132, Alberto di Bene |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: RE: Re: Re: Argo 1.31 bug report, WE0H |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Argo V1 build 132, Dexter McIntyre |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Argo V1 build 132, Alberto di Bene |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |