Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Reflector split?...please No.

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Reflector split?...please No.
From: "Marco Bruno IK1ODO" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:04:01 +0100 (added by [email protected])
Data: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:02:14 +0100
In-reply-to: <000201c09c33$feb1bc60$784e7ad5@default>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Hi all,

I agree with Alan, Alberto and others. Please, don't split the reflector!
The knowlwdge and wisdom of the list is very great.  Today an OM
may be interested in the last issues about millihertz-wide coding,
tomorrow in receiving loops or reception reports. One thing should not
exclude the other; we do it for fun, not for profession!

Some clever prefix to messages will help in reading, of course.
The same happens in other lists (look to WUN, they use MIL, DIG,
MAR, MISC to discriminate, and the traffic volume is similar to this
reflector).

To split will be a one-way process - this reflector is unique like the
band we are using, and ban-plans and other kind of gentleman
agreements would be very difficult to handle then.

73 - Marco IK1ODO (reading and saving EVERY message of this
list since August 1st, 1998)




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>