| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: Re: G3NYK/PA0SE-bridges |
| From: | "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Feb 2001 19:38:31 +0100 |
| References: | <000701c09dcf$6830e5c0$14b401d5@default> <[email protected]> <005d01c09f15$48ddd100$a77a74d5@w8k3f0> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
To All from PA0SE Alberto, I2PHD, wrote: Dick, maybe today I'm a bit denser than the usual. If your RG213 cable was terminated on its typical impedance, shouldn't the SWR have been 1:1 ? The 50 ohm resistor at the end should have entirely absorbed the RF energy with no reflections. But maybe I misunderstood you. Thanks for any clarification. I was the dense one! The cable was terminated by a 100 ohm resistor to obtain SWR = 2. 73, Dick, PA0SE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Measuring resistance of aerial system, Vernall |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: G3NYK/PA0SE-bridges, WarmSpgs |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: G3NYK/PA0SE-bridges, Alberto di Bene |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: G3NYK/PA0SE-bridges, Rye Gewalt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |