To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re:VA3LK Log / More Tests |
From: | "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:55:34 +0100 |
Organization: | Undisclosed |
References: | <12841.200101221318@gemini> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
James Moritz wrote: [snip] Since 3s/dot slow CW has not been good enough for this so far, I suggest we do something like this: As many European stations as possible transmit very long dashes (90seconds for example), within a very narrow frequency range (perhaps 20Hz maximum - 10Hz would be better), [snip] Just a remark. If you want to dig deep into the noise, you must use resolutions of 5 or 10 milli Hertz. At these resolutions the span covered by a spectrogram is at maximum a couple of Hertz, so the 10 or 20 Hz spread would mean that the biggest part of the stations will be outside the screen. 73 Alberto I2PHD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Argo, capture timing, Alberto di Bene |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re. Larrys tests, LAWRENCE MAYHEAD |
Previous by Thread: | LF: VA3LK Log / More Tests, James Moritz |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re:VA3LK Log / More Tests, James Moritz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |