Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Transatlantic

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Transatlantic
From: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:54:31 -0800
Organization: Netscape Online member
References: <[email protected]> <02ed01bf605e$2d643f00$0600a8c0@main>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>


Dave wrote:

Dear all,

Assuming that we're sticking to 1W erp then what does it matter how big the
antenna is as long as the power is sufficient to  give the required erp?

There is a big difference in the radiation pattern and angle of take off between
a high vertical antenna and a very low antenna given the same rf power to the
antenna. 1 Watt erp from a dummy load or low horizontal wire is hardly the same
as 1 Watt erp from a vertical antenna at 120 ft. There is also the RX
consideration especially on long haul signals. At LF the delivery system ie
ANTENNA is the most important factor. Even with large towers, and high elaborate
antennas, which are still physically small relative to 137 khz and a limit of 1W
erp, one has to realize the limitations, but at least there might be a chance.
73 de Mal/G3KEV




CFH peaks 33dB above the noise regularly (in 100Hz filter). If its erp is
around 8kW as rumoured then a 4W erp signal would be on the noise level,
normal good copy, and a 1W signal would be 6dB down. No problem for
Spectrogram.

There is a VE station building for the band and he intends to try some tests
next "fall" from VO1. That should do it!

73 de G3YXM.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>