Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+Sunday\s+morning\s+test\s+8270\.020\s+Hz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+Sunday\s+morning\s+test\s+8270\.020\s+Hz\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz (score: 1): Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:12:49 +0100; 2th try -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] PA1SDB, Peter To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 12:11 PM Subject: Re: VLF: Sunday mornin; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00027.html (26,587 bytes)
2. Re: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz (score: 1): Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 14:55:01 +0100; Hello Markus, VLF I tried to make some accents in the spectrum grab to make U clear :-) If I do time measurements in Spectrum Lab with the mouse cursor, then you went on air at ~07:42 and did go QRT; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00028.html (25,978 bytes)
3. RE: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz (score: 1): Author: Lubos OK2BVG <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 11:41:24 +0200; Hello Markus, Peter and VLF! Well done! There are two signals on my grabber now. Great! Markus, your VLF set is doing very well. Although you are useing "QRP" only (as you wrote in your e-mail), the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00038.html (15,257 bytes)
4. Re: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz (score: 1): Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 11:04:55 +0100; Hello Markus, VLF. It looks like that there is evidence of a positive reception results in OK2BVG & PA1SDB VLF grabber. http://www.ok2bvg.cz/vlfgrabber/ http://www.qsl.net/pa1sdb/ 73's, Peter - PA1SD; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00107.html (15,980 bytes)
5. Re: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 11:02:57 +0200; Great, it seems to work! DJ8WX had apparently interrupted his carrier for an hour but has come back. To my surprise, I seem to be making it to Appingedam as well http://www.ok2bvg.cz/vlfgrabber/ http; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00134.html (14,717 bytes)
6. Re: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz (score: 1): Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 14:15:13 +0100; Hello Markus, VLF At first I was quite sure, but later in the morning I started to doubt whether I did receive DF6NM. Meanwhile, in the afternoon I really see the trail of DF6NM appear in the spectro; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00135.html (20,333 bytes)
7. Re: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz (score: 1): Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 20:20:46 +0100; Hi Markus, Unfortunately you where already QRT befor the propagation got better. You'r right, perhaps propagation to your direction is differend in relation between Uwe and my QTH. If you take a look; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00240.html (25,181 bytes)
8. Re: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 12:39:44 +0200; Thank you Lubos and Peter! Paul Nicholson's http://abelian.org/vlf/sg8270.php is also starting to show the two carriers. Even though his synthetic loop antenna is pointing to 70 deg azimuth, a tick t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00242.html (19,365 bytes)
9. VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 21:03:37 +0200; This afternoon I have resonated the venerable seven-bucket VLF coil to my home antenna on 8.27 kHz, and I'm currently running a test transmission on 8270.020 Hz. Assuming appropriate weather conditio; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00296.html (10,609 bytes)
10. Re: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:35:33 +0200; Peter, yes I was also wondering whether it was really me but now it's sure. I think I did have some samplerate tracking issues around 11 UT, but it looks good again now. Interestingly but perhaps unr; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00306.html (23,143 bytes)
11. RE: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz (score: 1): Author: Lubos OK2BVG <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 08:45:37 +0200; Hello Markus, VLF! I am looking forward to see your signal on my grabber. It would be fine to see both signals, from Uwe and you, together. 73! Lubos From: [email protected] To: rsgb_lf_group@blac; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00341.html (11,044 bytes)
12. Re: VLF: Sunday morning test 8270.020 Hz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 00:18:48 +0200; Peter, LF, daytime VLF propagation normally depends on distance, solar elevation at midpath, and frequency. I noticed that Uwe and Henny are both around 180 km from you. This happens to be roughly th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00371.html (23,368 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]