Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+DFCW\-6000\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2017 14:05:29 +0200
VLF, Today, 12 UTC, i'm trying to leave my call on G3ZJOs 8270 Hz 424 uHz grabber. It may be visible on other spectrograms as well... 73, Stefan
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00070.html (8,703 bytes)

2. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 08:37:04 +0100
Hi Stefan Conditions are not as good during daylight as when you decided to give DFCW a try in 424 uHz. It will be interesting to see what happens during today. There was a glitch also at the start f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00081.html (10,622 bytes)

3. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:28:48 +0200
Hi Eddie, Paul, Jacek, VLF, Thanks for watching. I already saw the poor propagation during the first element and later the spectrogram slip. So it looks like Paul and Jacek could be the only watching
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00089.html (11,084 bytes)

4. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:45:58 +0200
Eddie, What i wanted to suggest: What about a loop as an alternative antenna? With 2 soundcards you could run 2 spectrograms comparing both antennas. You know the loop in my tree is a single turn loo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00090.html (11,887 bytes)

5. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 20:05:50 +0100
Hi Stefan Loops at this QTH are not very successful, yes lots of mains borne QRM. I do have a 1.2m diameter octagonal 10mm copper loop, I have never tried that on Sub 9kHz, I may try it one day down
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00097.html (12,296 bytes)

6. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 20:49:12 +0000
In the time it took to send 'DK7' you could have sent 330 characters using a more efficient mode. Or sent DK7 with a signal 20dB weaker. From a nearby thread: That's in the next revision, and some o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00101.html (13,219 bytes)

7. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:29:59 +0000
Just about fits in the spectrogram window http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=1491894000&b=120&s=sp -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00106.html (11,052 bytes)

8. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:01:10 +0200
Hi Paul, VLF, The transmission is complete now. 5 characters in not even 2 days!! I like DFCW anyway. :-) In attachment there is the spectrogram from the signal as received on the tree. I would be in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00109.html (11,658 bytes)

9. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:07:06 -0400
Attachment: dl0ao_vlf3_170410_1052_small.jpg Description: JPEG image
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00112.html (11,610 bytes)

10. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:14:28 +0200
Hi Markus, The spectrograms are nice, thanks. Good to train the local human analog decoder a bit, by interpreting elements buried in the noise :-) 73, Stefan Am 11.04.2017 14:07, schrieb Markus Veste
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00113.html (11,638 bytes)

11. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: John Bache G7JMZ <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:27:24 +0000
Blue sky idea: Might it be possible to subtract (rather than filter) the hum from the signal, being as it is such a constant source ? Either with analogue electronics, or via digital signal processin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00134.html (16,140 bytes)

12. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:35:42 +0000
This is the best I've got so far http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/170413a.png -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00141.html (11,334 bytes)

13. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:43:21 +0100
Hi John Good thinking. I think the hum filters used in SpectrumLab specificity the Paul Nicholson ones work in that manner. A lot of the mains borne interference is from consumer gadgets with switch
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00144.html (10,789 bytes)

14. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:59:34 +0200
...you may ask the neighbours to place a wire antenna close to their house, picking up strong E fields :-) These signals fed to a JFET source follower, then use a transformer somewhere in your RX cha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00148.html (11,836 bytes)

15. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 18:04:02 +0200
Hi Paul, Thanks for the spectrogram you produced. Am 10.04.2017 22:49, schrieb Paul Nicholson: From a nearby thread: That's in the next revision, and some other alterations which I hope I can finish
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00151.html (10,741 bytes)

16. Re: VLF: DFCW-6000 (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:51:30 +0100
On 13/04/2017 14:59, DK7FC wrote: ...you may ask the neighbours to place a wire antenna close to their house, picking up strong E fields :-) These signals fed to a JFET source follower, then use a tr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00155.html (11,513 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu