Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+VE7TIL\s+Grabber\s+and\s+DCF39\s+Monitor\s+back\s+online\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:01:59 +0000
Hi All I'm pleased to report the noise problem has been resolved and most of the renovations here are complete. The 2200m grabber and DCF39 monitor are back online. 73 Scott VE7TIL http://www3.telus.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00683.html (8,048 bytes)

2. Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:04:51 +0100
This is good news, Scott. Is there any chance of one of your grabbers being tuned to the EU DX Tx window of 136.318kHz? Mike. G3XDV ==
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00001.html (10,032 bytes)

3. Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:43:18 +0100
Scott, I do not have direct experience of running a grabber, but it seems to me that your main difficulty is that, even with a SSB bandwidth on your LF receiver, you cannot cover DCF39 and the Eu DX
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00004.html (13,677 bytes)

4. Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dove <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:14:18 +0000
Hi Scott, I did something like that for a while on the Grabulator, cheesing using a super-wide(?) filter to encompass all things of interest on 137. Didn't last long. There's a big disparity between
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00040.html (12,504 bytes)

5. Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:53:47 +0000
Hi Mike Unfortunately as the main LF RX is tuned to allow reception of the upper end of the band 137778ish and DCF39 the EU DX window is not within my passband. I hope to have a SDR online sometime i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00058.html (11,023 bytes)

6. Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:11:26 +0100
Hi Scott I forgot to mention I guess you are using Spec lab.......have a word with Jean- Pierre or Wolf because you can run split windows.......this doesnt help if you have a limitation of an SSB fil
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00189.html (16,129 bytes)

7. Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 22:13:47 +0200
Dear LF, I would very much support Jay's point, and I favour the current frequency allocations for the split TA and Eu slots. Scott, how about if you traded in DCF39 for HGA22? It's slightly stronger
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00319.html (17,150 bytes)

8. Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:20:43 -0400
One other constraint over here -- during the rare periods that CFH is running on 137.000, weak signal reception would be tough within +/- 300 Hz. John A. Several hundred Hz separation between the W-E
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00355.html (14,671 bytes)

9. Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:51:30 +0000
Hi Mike/Markus and Group I think I found a solution that would allow for me to capture HGA22, EU Dx window, NA DX window and DCF39 on one of my RX I presently have. My TS-440s has a wide band filter
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00356.html (18,292 bytes)

10. Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:05:35 +0000
Hi Markus Wonderful suggestion! Now would make a wonderful time to make the transition in data capture as the window between VE7 and EU closes for the season. I will investigate and post when the cha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00421.html (16,975 bytes)

11. Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 20:27:14 +0000
Hi Mike and Group I very much appreciate the suggestions of QSYing the EU DX window but that appears rather aggressive to deal with my RX limitations and would involve many others having to change th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00424.html (15,396 bytes)

12. Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 06:03:18 +0000
Hi Mike If you or anyone can assist me in getting the equipment or expertise to get this setup I can commit to have it operational from a low noise site for the next DX season. I just welcomed my fir
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00473.html (12,243 bytes)

13. Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:00:26 +0100
OK, all understood. Thanks for considering the idea. 73 de Mike ==
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00507.html (11,461 bytes)

14. Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:04:59 -0400
Mike Several hundred Hz separation between the W-E and E-W T/A windows would be nice - the old 136.318 / 137.777 worked well. Since the EU stations have abandoned 136.318 and moved to 137.777 it has
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00512.html (13,988 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu