Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+USA\s+136kHz\s+proposals\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+USA\s+136kHz\s+proposals\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: USA 136kHz proposals (score: 1): Author: "Giulio Scaroni" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 01:23:48 +0200; One of the reasons cited in the FCC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is an objection filed by Texas Instruments, who make "smart card" readers that work at 121 kHz. They're afraid hams are going to ope; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00067.html (11,817 bytes)
2. LF: USA 136kHz proposals (score: 1): Author: "Holger 'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 04:19:35 -0400; Hello LF-folks, especially across the Atlantic ocean, reading through the FCC NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING of May, 2nd, I am surprised how thoroughly the FCC guys have investigated the matter of a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00099.html (11,630 bytes)
3. Re: LF: USA 136kHz proposals (score: 1): Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 18:39:40 +0100; << I am puzzled why they are putting this stipulation on bandwidth, which I do not believe anybody else has done. >> You've heard of the philosophy some folks have over here? The one about: "the busi; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00103.html (11,163 bytes)
4. Re: LF: USA 136kHz proposals (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 11:35:29 EDT; << I am puzzled why they are putting this stipulation on bandwidth, which I do not believe anybody else has done. >> You've heard of the philosophy some folks have over here? The one about: "the busi; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00107.html (9,620 bytes)
5. LF: USA 136kHz proposals (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 11:28:00 +0100; I see from yesterday's ARRL Letter that the proposal for the USA 136 band is for 1W ERP and bandwidth less than 100Hz. I am puzzled why they are putting this stipulation on bandwidth, which I do not; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00114.html (9,054 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]